Why don't we use video evidence?

Kimbo at 23h37
18
Nov
2009
Why don't we use video evidence?

Someone answer this question. Every week games are decided by either corrupt or horrendously incompetent refs, sometimes it costs teams big time like tonight.

We're in the dark ages here, football hasn't moved on since the 1930s ffs, it's still a corrupt primitive pile of horsehsit.
About
This topic belongs to the forum
  • Numbers of topics : 22334
  • Numbers of messages : 1210554
  • Numbers of users : 1274
  • Numbers of points : 9395
Similar topics
I posted it earlier in another thread, but looks interesting enough to warrant its own thread. 1:35 is the alves
http://www.motorcyclenews.com/MCN/News/newsresults/General-news/2009/August/aug0609-end-lost-licence-fiasco/?&R=EPI-117381 CLICK HERE TO SIGN THE PETITION Hundreds of drivers and motorcyclists tell of sending their driving licence to th
I am inclined to believe this is solid proof that it is the latter - matchfixing/corporate fixing whatever. Was there ever any doubt though about this? Tech error or evidence of rampant IPL matchfixing? LINK! The linked page must be seen as mere tex
"A picture is worth a thousand words"
Calciopoli: Evidence Of Inter Phonecalls Mysteriously Goes Missing - Report Luciano Moggi's defence raise questions over alleged missing evidence involving Inter... There has been another twist in the Calciopoli trial after new allegations regarding
Forums from same category
See also
more_less
Informations

44 Replies For the topic :
"Why don't we use video evidence?"

This topic has been viewed 1420 times.

Last message :
18/11/2009 at 23h37 by "Kimbo"